Super-Tall and Super-Slender Structures

Skyscrapers with smaller footprints require countermeasures to wind and sway.

Engineering

Current Issue

This Article From Issue

November-December 2019

Volume 107, Number 6
Page 342

DOI: 10.1511/2019.107.6.342

The Washington Monument stands alone, tall and slender on a little hill, with its distance from any other structure making it seem even taller and more slender than it actually is. Last summer, when the world was celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Apollo mission’s “one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind,” the image of a rocket projected on a side of the monument made it appear even taller and more slender still. Indeed, the masonry faux obelisk has a height 10 times the length of one side of its square base. Coincidentally, a height-to-width ratio of 10 to 1 is one of the more-or-less arbitrary definitions of a slender structure. Some engineers (and building codes) consider a ratio as small as 7 to 1 as the line of demarcation. Others take a ratio of 12 to 1 as the cutoff point. Whatever the number, the height-to-width ratio is sometimes referred to as the slenderness ratio, and sometimes as the aspect ratio. Whatever it is called, the definition of a slender structure remains somewhat subjective. Most people just know a slender tower when they see it, regardless of the numbers.

Wikimedia Commons

To access the full article, please log in or subscribe.

American Scientist Comments and Discussion

To discuss our articles or comment on them, please share them and tag American Scientist on social media platforms. Here are links to our profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

If we re-share your post, we will moderate comments/discussion following our comments policy.