Hallmarks of Consciousness

Since the 19th century, philosophers and scientists have failed to agree on reliable markers of sentience.

Biology History of STEM Neuroscience Philosophy of Science

Current Issue

This Article From Issue

July-August 2026

Volume 114, Number 4
Page 240

DOI: 10.1511/2026.114.4.240

A frog will wipe away a spot of acid spattered on its side—even after its entire head has been surgically removed. This strange fact was no surprise in 1853 when a young German physiologist named Eduard Pflüger published his findings; researchers had long known that many reflexes are preserved in brainless vertebrates. But Pflüger’s experiment became a blockbuster because of what happened next.

QUICK TAKE
  • In the 1850s, a physiologist discovered that a decapitated frog can try different means to achieve a goal. The study ignited a debate over the true markers of consciousness.
  • Researchers consider behavioral markers to determine whether a creature or species is conscious. But they still dispute which behaviors, if any, are reliable indicators of consciousness.
  • To move the debate forward, researchers should perhaps heed the advice of the 19th-century psychologist William James and drop the reliance on markers altogether.

To access the full article, please log in or subscribe.

American Scientist Comments and Discussion

To discuss our articles or comment on them, please share them and tag American Scientist on social media platforms. Here are links to our profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

If we re-share your post, we will moderate comments/discussion following our comments policy.