
This Article From Issue
November-December 2001
Volume 89, Number 6
Page 495
DOI: 10.1511/2001.40.495
The public embarrassment that some well-known British architects and engineers suffered when their highly visible and ambitious Millennium projects did not proceed according to plan was attributable in part to their determination to go well beyond the envelope of experience (Engineering, September–October 2001). But most engineering and design projects present much less grandeur and pretension than lifting the world’s largest Ferris wheel upright in one piece or sculpting a pedestrian bridge with an unprecedentedly low profile. That is not to say that the anonymous architects, engineers and industrial designers who create the everyday objects that we use with little notice are any less confident of their talent or less presumptuous in their goal of producing revolutionary new gadgets or redesigning classic old ones.
Photograph courtesy of Catherine Petroski
American Scientist Comments and Discussion
To discuss our articles or comment on them, please share them and tag American Scientist on social media platforms. Here are links to our profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
If we re-share your post, we will moderate comments/discussion following our comments policy.