The Information Paradox
The content you've requested is available without charge only to active Sigma Xi members and American Scientist subscribers.
If you are an active member or an individual subscriber, please log in now in order to access this article.
If you are not a member or individual subscriber, you can:
Scientists in many fields work with information processes but lack a good definition of information. The concept of information can seem abstract and intangible. But, as the authors note, information is real and tangible, and a rigorous science has been built around it. They discuss the history of information along with examples of why information is real and tangible, and why it cannot exist without representation in a physical medium. Finally, they propose an alternative to Claude Shannon's original model of information theory that allows for the existence of meaning.