The content you've requested is available without charge only to active Sigma Xi members and American Scientist subscribers.
If you are an active member or an individual subscriber, please log in now in order to access this article.
If you are not a member or individual subscriber, you can:
Science has so far failed to provide any way to predict earthquakes
on a timescale of days, weeks or months. But geologists are able to
determine, at least roughly, the probability that an earthquake of a
certain size might strike a given area within, say, decades to
centuries. Such predictions are useful for establishing
seismic-safety requirements in building codes, for example. The
problem is that there are few ways to test such evaluations of local
seismic hazard. One novel system uses precariously balanced
boulders. If one can be found, it serves as an indicator that an
earthquake of sufficient size to topple the tippy rock has not
occurred—at least not for a very long time. This
commonsensical observation has blossomed into a quantitative
technique for testing more conventional seismic-hazard assessments.
Connect With Us:
An early peek at each new issue, with descriptions of feature articles, columns, and more. Every other issue contains links to everything in the latest issue's table of contents.News of book reviews published in American Scientist and around the web, as well as other noteworthy happenings in the world of science books.
To sign up for automatic emails of the American Scientist Update and Scientists' Nightstand issues, create an online profile, then sign up in the My AmSci area.
JSTOR, the online academic archive, contains complete back issues of American Scientist from 1913 (known then as the Sigma Xi Quarterly) through 2005.
The table of contents for each issue is freely available to all users; those with institutional access can read each complete issue.
View the full collection here.
Receive notification when new content is posted from the entire website, or choose from the customized feeds available.