Subscribe
Subscribe
MY AMERICAN SCIENTIST
LOG IN! REGISTER!
SEARCH
 
Logo IMG
HOME > My Amsci > Restricted Access

Is Combustion of Plastics Desirable?



Restricted Access The content you've requested is available without charge only to active Sigma Xi members and American Scientist subscribers.


If you are an active member or an individual subscriber, please log in now in order to access this article.

If you are not a member or individual subscriber, you can:



Abstract:

Figure 7. Crane transports bulk wasteClick to Enlarge Image

Plastic waste is mounting, mostly in landfills, and our authors review current disposal strategies, which also include recycling and burning. Plastics, they note, can be a clean and potent source of energy when burned. The authors review the trade-offs involved in waste-to-energy combustion and argue that as pollution controls improve, the release of toxic emissions—primarily dioxins and heavy metals—can be minimized. They conclude that the risks are not as great as the public assumes and end by advocating an increase in waste-to-energy programs.


Connect With Us:

Facebook Icon Sm Twitter Icon Google+ Icon Pinterest Icon RSS Feed Instagram Icon

Subscribe to Free eNewsletters!


Read Past Issues on JSTOR

JSTOR, the online academic archive, contains complete back issues of American Scientist from 1913 (known then as the Sigma Xi Quarterly) through 2005.

The table of contents for each issue is freely available to all users; those with institutional access can read each complete issue.

View the full collection here.


RSS Feed Subscription

Receive notification when new content is posted from the entire website, or choose from the customized feeds available.


Write for American Scientist

Review our submission guidelines.


Subscribe to American Scientist