Why We See What We Do

A probabilistic strategy based on past experience explains the remarkable difference between what we see and physical reality

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mark Williams for assistance with many of the figures and to the National Institutes of Health for support.

Lotto, R. B., and D. Purves. 1999. The effects of color on brightness. Nature Neuroscience 2:1010–1014.
Lotto, R. B., and D. Purves. 2000. An empirical explanation of color contrast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97:12834–12839. [CrossRef]
Lotto, R. B., and D. Purves. 2002. A rationale for the structure of color space. Trends in Neuroscience 25:84–88. [CrossRef]
Nundy, S., R. B. Lotto, D. Coppola, A. Shimpi and D. Purves. 2000. Why are angles misperceived? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97(10):5592–5597.
Purves, D., A. Shimpi and R. B. Lotto. 1999. An empirical explanation of the Cornsweet effect. Journal of Neuroscience 19:8542–8551.
Purves, D., R. B. Lotto, S. M. Williams, S. Nundy and Z. Yang. 2001. Why we see things the way we do: Evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London B 356:285–297. [CrossRef]
Williams, S. M., A. N. McCoy and D. Purves. 1998. The influence of depicted illumination on perceived brightness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:13296–13300. [CrossRef]
Williams, S. M., A. N. McCoy and D. Purves. 1998. An empirical explanation of brightness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:13301–13306. [CrossRef]