Lurz’s “logical problem” applies also to my attribution of consciousness to fellow humans, but "economy of explanation" does not deny it to them because, having found consciousness necessary to explain my own experience, it would be wasteful of me not to use it also to help explain the behaviour of others (even though, in my absence it may not have been necessary and so might have properly been ruled out).
And by the same token, it is at least as economical to attribute animal behaviours that give the appearance of being conscious to something similar to what happens in human minds rather than to something completely different.
posted by Alan Cooper
February 21, 2012 @ 7:01 PM
Connect With Us:
An early peek at each new issue, with descriptions of feature articles, columns, and more. Every other issue contains links to everything in the latest issue's table of contents.News of book reviews published in American Scientist and around the web, as well as other noteworthy happenings in the world of science books.
To sign up for automatic emails of the American Scientist Update and Scientists' Nightstand issues, create an online profile, then sign up in the My AmSci area.
Receive notification when new content is posted from the entire website, or choose from the customized feeds available.
JSTOR, the online academic archive, contains complete back issues of American Scientist from 1913 (known then as the Sigma Xi Quarterly) through 2005.
The table of contents for each issue is freely available to all users; those with institutional access can read each complete issue.
View the full collection here.