Logo IMG

The Organisms that Made It All Possible


Thanks for taking the trouble to review my book. Obviously, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and no book can hope to satisfy every reader, but I would like to correct a couple of minor errors in the review.

Firstly, the book does not "defend the use of genetically modified organisms and animal experimentation". I make it clear that I am opposed to genetically modified foods, for reasons I explain in detail, but I quote the views of the scientists I interview, pointing out that they have a financial stake in their research; I leave the reader to make up their own mind. Similarly, I discuss the objections to research on animals, although I personally feel it's sometimes justified.

While you may find my cultural history of corn in bad taste (no other reviewer or reader has complained to date), I do not discuss "corn as an alleged sexual stimulant", but precisely the opposite: the belief that corn could be part of a healthy, sugar-free diet that would reduce sexual desire, not stimulate it.

Finally, the comment about putting aside "the question of whether one can discuss the ethics of scientific research without at least attempting to understand the science behind it" strikes me as a little odd. It implies that I don't discuss science in the book, which is nonsense: there is a huge amount of science in the book and I spent a lot of time getting geneticists to read it and check that it was accurate. Reading the book is no substitute for taking a science degree, of course, which is what I acknowledge, but I really don't think I can be accused of not attempting to understand -- and to explain -- the science.

posted by Jim Endersby
August 12, 2008


Connect With Us:

Facebook Icon Sm Twitter Icon Google+ Icon Pinterest Icon RSS Feed

Sigma Xi/Amazon Smile (SciNight)

Latest Multimedia

VIDEO: Citizen Scientists Aid Researchers in Studying Camel Crickets

MJEpps CricketsThey may bounce really high and look strange, but don't worry, they are harmless...they even scavenge for crumbs off of your floor! A continental-scale citizen science campaign was launched in order to study the spread and frequency of native and nonnative camel crickets in human homes across North America.

Mary Jane Epps, PhD, an author of the paper, went into more detail about the study and significance of citizen scientists in an interview with Katie-Leigh Corder, web managing editor.

To view all multimedia content, click "Latest Multimedia"!

Subscribe to Free eNewsletters!

  • Sigma Xi SmartBrief:

    A free daily summary of the latest news in scientific research. Each story is summarized concisely and linked directly to the original source for further reading.

  • American Scientist Update

  • An early peek at each new issue, with descriptions of feature articles, columns, Science Observers and more. Every other issue contains links to everything in the latest issue's table of contents.

  • Scientists' Nightstand

  • News of book reviews published in American Scientist and around the web, as well as other noteworthy happenings in the world of science books.

    To sign up for automatic emails of the American Scientist Update and Scientists' Nightstand issues, create an online profile, then sign up in the My AmSci area.

Subscribe to American Scientist