Subscribe
Subscribe
MY AMERICAN SCIENTIST
LOG IN! REGISTER!
SEARCH
 
Logo IMG

BOOK REVIEW

Fantasy Land

Mark Browning

A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. Noretta Koertge, ed. 322 pp. Oxford University Press, 1998. $29.95.

For many followers of postmodern theories, the House of Science resembles the Southern plantation house, a facade of grace and stability, hiding a corrupt interior, built on the oppression of others. For Noretta Koertge and her collaborators, the House of Postmodernism is a fantasy place with only tangential connection to reality, a house built on sand. The book strives to provide "critiques of the postmodernist case studies that are cited over and over again as evidence for the claim that the results of natural science tell us more about social context than they do about the natural world." The importance of this statement is considerable. Any theory can be supported by carefully selecting the data, but these contributors have avoided cherry-picking, focusing instead on the core works in postmodern science studies.

The first of five sections covers the famous Alan Sokal hoax article in Social Text and includes laudably measured comments by Sokal himself. In Sokal's essay and in the works by Paul Boghossian and Philip Kitcher that follow, what will become a recurring theme is sounded: A place exists for critiques of science by those in the humanities and social sciences, but that place is not nearly as large as the one postmodernists have attempted to build for themselves

The section "Myths, Metaphors, and Misreadings" is the most consistent of the lot and explores the truth behind various postmodernist assumptions about science. Paul Gross's "Bashful Eggs, Macho Sperm, and Tonypandy" thoroughly debunks the idea, popularized in Newsweek, that embryologists portray a passive egg approached by a "warrior sperm" in the process of conception. Through reference to more than 100 years of literature, Gross demonstrates that this metaphor simply does not exist in any meaningful way. The same sort of truth hunt concerning charges of sexism is found in the articles of Philip Sullivan (concerning fluid dynamics and statistics) and Michael Ruse (Darwinism).

In the section that deals with the beginnings of modern science, Alan Soble masterfully defends Francis Bacon against charges that he shaped science through frequent use of rape and torture metaphors, and William Newman shatters the ahistorical view of a few feminists that alchemy represents a softer, more feminine form of science that was destroyed by a repressive scientific patriarchy.

The most notable contribution in the section exploring the serious ramifications that flow from these postmodern misconceptions is editor Noretta Koertge's account of a call for "postmodern mathematics," which suggests placing calculus in the elementary curriculum and saving fractions for college, and for "female-friendly science," which would effectively overturn all accepted methods.

The part of this collection that focuses on the construction of experiments is to me the least compelling because it is the most technical, complete with complicated equations that made this reviewer's head spin. I have held this section until the end because it illustrates my one reservation about an excellent collection. Throughout the book, but especially in this section, those who attack science are proved wrong, but they are proved wrong using the cognitive framework, methods and even the technical apparatus of science. This is, essentially, preaching to the choir. Just as the postmodernists can be criticized for their lack of science fluency, many of science's defenders need greater fluency in feminism, deconstruction and other theories if they are to move this debate outside of the respective houses of postmodernism and science and out onto the common.—Mark Browning, English, Johnson County (Kansas) Community College


comments powered by Disqus
 

Connect With Us:

Facebook Icon Sm Twitter Icon Google+ Icon Pinterest Icon RSS Feed

Sigma Xi/Amazon Smile (SciNight)


Latest Multimedia

ANIMATION: Hydrangea Colors: It’s All in the SoilHydrangeaAnimation

The Hydrangea macrophylla (big-leafed hydrangea) plant is the only known plant that can 'detect' the pH level in surrounding soil!
One of the world’s most popular ornamental flowers, it conceals a bouquet of biological and biochemical surprises. The iconic “snowball” shaped hydrangea blooms are a common staple of backyard gardens.
Hydrangea colors ultimately depend on the availability of aluminum ions(Al3+) within the soil.

To view all multimedia content, click "Latest Multimedia"!


Subscribe to Free eNewsletters!

  • Sigma Xi SmartBrief:

    A free daily summary of the latest news in scientific research. Each story is summarized concisely and linked directly to the original source for further reading.

  • American Scientist Update

  • An early peek at each new issue, with descriptions of feature articles, columns, Science Observers and more. Every other issue contains links to everything in the latest issue's table of contents.

  • Scientists' Nightstand

  • News of book reviews published in American Scientist and around the web, as well as other noteworthy happenings in the world of science books.

    To sign up for automatic emails of the American Scientist Update and Scientists' Nightstand issues, create an online profile, then sign up in the My AmSci area.


EMAIL TO A FRIEND :

Of Possible Interest

Book Review: Don't Try This at Home

Book Review: Keeping the Holmes Fires Burning

Book Review: “The Colonel Says”

Subscribe to American Scientist