American Scientist Online. The Magazine of Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society
For more information on OriginLab, click here!
Home Current Issue Archives Bookshelf Online Features Marketplace Subscribe
In This Section
Visitor Login
Username
Password

 

Volume: 89 Number: 6 Page: 490
DOI: 10.1511/2001.6.490

COMPUTING SCIENCE

Other Formats: Postscript (gzipped)   Postscript   PDF  

Third Base


This column was published in the November–December 2001 issue of American Scientist. For an illustrated version, please download an alternative format.

People count by tens and machines count by twos—that pretty much sums up the way we do arithmetic on this planet. But there are countless other ways to count. Here I want to offer three cheers for base 3, the ternary system. The numerals in this sequence—beginning 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 100, 101—are not as widely known or widely used as their decimal and binary cousins, but they have charms all their own. They are the Goldilocks choice among numbering systems: When base 2 is too small and base 10 is too big, base 3 is just right.

Continued
1 2 3 4 5 6 next >
  Of Possible Interest
Book Review: Art in Code
 
 
 
  Related Sigma Xi Links  
For more information on OriginLab, click here!
About American Scientist Site Map Text Archive Advertise Policies Sigma Xi Contact Us
© Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society